Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research by John Forge

By John Forge

The pilot-less drones, clever bombs and different high-tech guns on demonstrate in fresh conflicts are all of the consequence of guns learn. even though, the type of medical and technological endeavour has been round for a very long time, generating not just the armaments of Nazi Germany and the atomic bombs dropped on Japan, however the catapults utilized in old Greece and Rome and the attack rifles utilized by baby infantrymen in Africa.  during this publication John Forge examines such guns study and asks if it is morally appropriate to adopt such an job. He argues that it truly is in truth morally incorrect to participate in guns study as its basic goal is to supply the potential to hurt others, and additionally he argues that each one makes an attempt to then justify participation in guns study don't face up to scrutiny.

This booklet has large charm in fields of philosophy and similar components, to boot to a extra common viewers who're questioned concerning the cost at which new guns are amassed.

Show description

Read Online or Download Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research (Research Ethics Forum) PDF

Best research books

The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice

'For someone trying to create that means out of existence, motivate others with ebook of analysis discoveries and insights, and support the realm develop into a greater position in which to dwell and paintings, motion study holds nice promise as an strategy. The problem is to do it good and with rigor. The instruction manual is a powerful number of articles that would aid the reader do all of that' - Richard E.

Condensed Matter Research Using Neutrons: Today and Tomorrow

The complicated learn Workshop (ARW) on Condensed subject Re­ seek utilizing Neutrons, at the present time and the following day used to be held in Abingdon, Oxfordshire for 4 days starting 26 March 1984. The Workshop was once subsidized through NATO and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. a complete of 32 academics and contributors attended.

Responsive Open Learning Environments: Outcomes of Research from the ROLE Project

This ebook provides the results of 4 years of academic examine within the EU-supported undertaking known as function (Responsive on-line studying Environments). function expertise is situated round the notion of self-regulated studying that creates accountable rookies, who're able to serious considering and ready to plan their very own studying methods.

Additional info for Designed to Kill: The Case Against Weapons Research (Research Ethics Forum)

Sample text

38 Armstrong (1989) is a good introduction. Armstrong follows Aristotle and holds, against Plato, that there are no uninstantiated universals. A design that was never implemented would have this status. It would still count as an item of knowledge, and something that was the product of intelligent activity, but it would not qualify as a universal until it was instantiated. 39 And this view cannot be the whole story. Artefacts are natural objects and hence have the same sorts of properties as naturally-occurring natural objects, but they are also designed by agents and would not exist but for the intervention of agency.

One might then speak of the specifications counterfactually: were there the available resources, this would have been a set of instructions for this artefact. 23 18 2 Weapons, Weapons Research and the Case Against Weapons Research wide, so as to include all the elements and processes that contribute to weapons development and all the personnel involved. A set of instructions tells someone – anyone with sufficient skill – how do so something, and so a design is clearly an item of knowledge. 26 And this straightforward view of design and weapons design is evidently along the right lines, but there are some further distinctions that we can usefully make in order to get a clearer view of what design is and how designs are invented or discovered.

7 – but in whatever way we do explain the influence of artefacts on our lives, this cannot be with reference to artefacts as agents in any sense of the term. Likewise, the moral relevance debate has two extreme views, linked to those of the autonomy debate. One of these, that artefacts themselves have moral responsibility, I dismiss on the same grounds as I reject the agency view. ), which holds that all moral responsibility for the use of artefacts falls on the designers and users. 42 Such debates are relevant to the present project to the extent that they cast doubt on the question of the responsibility of weapons designers for the effects of their work, but they are also relevant if they provide further support for the idea that the effects of WR are beyond the control of the weapons researcher.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.37 of 5 – based on 32 votes